Croatia vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Croatia
0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Saint Lucia
0.7355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Croatia rank
57th
Saint Lucia rank
58th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Croatia
  • Saint Lucia
-0.500.511.5199620102025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Croatia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3764 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2000s 0.5609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2010s 0.5432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4799 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saint Lucia
2020s 0.6957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0247 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Croatia or Saint Lucia?
Croatia, at 0.7384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Croatia and Saint Lucia?
0.0029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Saint Lucia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Saint Lucia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/st-lucia/">Croatia vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.