Croatia vs Seychelles: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Croatia
0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Seychelles
0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Croatia rank
58th
Seychelles rank
59th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Croatia
  • Seychelles
-0.5-0.2500.250.50.75199620102024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.0143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Seychelles ahead.

Croatia ranks 58th and Seychelles ranks 59th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Seychelles in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Seychelles Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4757 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Seychelles
2000s 0.5583 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3675 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2010s 0.5109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2253 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2855 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2020s 0.6068 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6443 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Seychelles

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Croatia or Seychelles?
Croatia, at 0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.6344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Seychelles as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Croatia and Seychelles?
0.0143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Seychelles?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Seychelles rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 58th and Seychelles ranks 59th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Seychelles: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/seychelles/">Croatia vs Seychelles: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.