Cote d'Ivoire vs Honduras: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Cote d'Ivoire
-0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Honduras
-0.6535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cote d'Ivoire rank
133rd
Honduras rank
135th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Honduras
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports -0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Honduras, a difference of 0.0368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Honduras ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Honduras ranks 135th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Honduras in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Honduras Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2000s -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9002 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2010s -0.7151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Honduras
2020s -0.659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6861 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cote d'Ivoire or Honduras?
Cote d'Ivoire, at -0.6167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6535 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Honduras as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cote d'Ivoire and Honduras?
0.0368 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Honduras?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Honduras rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 133rd and Honduras ranks 135th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Honduras: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/honduras/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cote-d-ivoire/honduras/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Honduras: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.