Colombia vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Colombia
0.0346 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Hungary
-0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Colombia rank
100th
Hungary rank
103rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Colombia
  • Hungary
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0346 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.

Colombia ranks 100th and Hungary ranks 103rd of 206 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2000s -0.2887 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2010s -0.0143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary
2020s 0.0293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Colombia or Hungary?
Colombia, at 0.0346 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Colombia and Hungary?
0.0623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Hungary?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Colombia and Hungary rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Colombia ranks 100th and Hungary ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/colombia/hungary/">Colombia vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.