Canada vs Iceland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Canada
- Iceland
How they compare
Canada currently reports 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iceland, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 14th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Canada |
| 2000s | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Canada |
| 2020s | 1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.43 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Canada or Iceland?
- Canada, at 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Canada and Iceland?
- 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Iceland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Canada ranks 12th and Iceland ranks 14th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.