Burkina Faso vs Togo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Burkina Faso
-0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Togo
-0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
153rd
Togo rank
155th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Togo
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Togo, a difference of 0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 153rd and Togo ranks 155th of 207 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Togo Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6963 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2000s -0.3602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2010s -0.2039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8293 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6254 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2020s -0.5283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8622 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3339 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Togo?
Burkina Faso, at -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9718 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Togo as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Togo?
0.0073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Togo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Togo rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Burkina Faso ranks 153rd and Togo ranks 155th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Togo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/togo/">Burkina Faso vs Togo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.