Burkina Faso vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Burkina Faso
-0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Oman
-0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
152nd
Oman rank
149th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Oman
-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102024

How they compare

Oman currently reports -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 152nd and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Oman Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6487 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2000s -0.3602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2010s -0.2039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6699 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2020s -0.5283 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7879 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Oman?
Oman, at -0.8877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Burkina Faso as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Oman?
0.0768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Burkina Faso and Oman rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Burkina Faso ranks 152nd and Oman ranks 149th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/oman/">Burkina Faso vs Oman: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.