Brunei vs El Salvador: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Brunei
-0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
El Salvador
-0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brunei rank
145th
El Salvador rank
144th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Brunei
  • El Salvador
-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei, a difference of 0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.

Brunei ranks 145th and El Salvador ranks 144th of 206 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9422 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2000s -0.8021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7502 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2010s -0.6046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0472 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5574 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador
2020s -0.7991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.4851 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brunei or El Salvador?
El Salvador, at -0.7884 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brunei as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brunei and El Salvador?
0.0115 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and El Salvador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brunei and El Salvador rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Brunei ranks 145th and El Salvador ranks 144th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs El Salvador: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brunei-darussalam/el-salvador/">Brunei vs El Salvador: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.