Brazil vs Israel: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Brazil
- Israel
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel, a difference of 0.0213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Israel ahead.
Brazil ranks 83rd and Israel ranks 85th of 206 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.276 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2000s | 0.5242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0946 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
| 2020s | 0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4629 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brazil or Israel?
- Brazil, at 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.2952 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Israel as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brazil and Israel?
- 0.0213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Israel?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Israel rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Brazil ranks 83rd and Israel ranks 85th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.