Brazil vs Fiji, Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Brazil
0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Fiji, Republic of
0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Brazil rank
83rd
Fiji, Republic of rank
81st

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Brazil
  • Fiji, Republic of
-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

Fiji, Republic of currently reports 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil, a difference of 0.0151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 83rd and Fiji, Republic of ranks 81st of 206 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Fiji, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2719 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0883 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1836 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2000s 0.5242 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2576 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7818 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2010s 0.441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5082 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil
2020s 0.1678 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0449 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Brazil or Fiji, Republic of?
Fiji, Republic of, at 0.3316 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Brazil and Fiji, Republic of?
0.0151 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Fiji, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Fiji, Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Fiji, Republic of rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Brazil ranks 83rd and Fiji, Republic of ranks 81st of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Fiji, Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/fiji/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/brazil/fiji/">Brazil vs Fiji, Republic of: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.