Bolivia vs Nepal: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Bolivia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -0.1682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bolivia, a difference of 0.0053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 117th and Nepal ranks 115th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3619 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bolivia |
| 2000s | 0.1507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bolivia |
| 2010s | -0.0216 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2885 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.267 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bolivia |
| 2020s | -0.2104 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0753 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bolivia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at -0.1682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1735 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bolivia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bolivia and Nepal?
- 0.0053 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Nepal?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Nepal rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bolivia ranks 117th and Nepal ranks 115th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.