Bermuda vs Malta: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Bermuda
- Malta
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta, a difference of 0.0504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Bermuda ranks 40th and Malta ranks 42nd of 208 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9784 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.072 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.9609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bermuda or Malta?
- Bermuda, at 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9796 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malta as of 2017.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bermuda and Malta?
- 0.0504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Malta?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2017.
- How do Bermuda and Malta rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Bermuda ranks 40th and Malta ranks 42nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.