Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Barbados
0.994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cayman Islands
0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Barbados rank
37th
Cayman Islands rank
39th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Barbados
  • Cayman Islands
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0.0363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cayman Islands ahead.

Barbados ranks 37th and Cayman Islands ranks 39th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Cayman Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Cayman Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2376 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cayman Islands
2000s 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1664 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2010s 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados
2020s 0.976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Barbados or Cayman Islands?
Barbados, at 0.994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Barbados and Cayman Islands?
0.0363 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cayman Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Cayman Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Barbados ranks 37th and Cayman Islands ranks 39th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/cayman-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/barbados/cayman-islands/">Barbados vs Cayman Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.