Bahamas vs Nauru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Bahamas
0.5531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Nauru
0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bahamas rank
63rd
Nauru rank
62nd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Bahamas
  • Nauru
0.40.60.811.2199620102024

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bahamas, a difference of 0.046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 63rd and Nauru ranks 62nd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 3 and Nauru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Nauru Difference Ahead
1990s 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0993 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas
2000s 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9921 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.059 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas
2010s 0.7506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8156 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nauru
2020s 0.6055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1501 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Bahamas or Nauru?
Nauru, at 0.5991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Bahamas and Nauru?
0.046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Nauru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Nauru rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Bahamas ranks 63rd and Nauru ranks 62nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Nauru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/naoero/">Bahamas vs Nauru: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.