Austria vs Liechtenstein: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Austria
1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Liechtenstein
1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Austria rank
16th
Liechtenstein rank
18th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Austria
  • Liechtenstein
00.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Liechtenstein's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Liechtenstein ahead.

Austria ranks 16th and Liechtenstein ranks 18th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Liechtenstein in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1990s 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.54 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Liechtenstein
2000s 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria
2010s 1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.48 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria
2020s 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1414 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Austria or Liechtenstein?
Austria, at 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Austria and Liechtenstein?
0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Liechtenstein?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Austria and Liechtenstein rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Austria ranks 16th and Liechtenstein ranks 18th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Liechtenstein: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/austria/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/austria/liechtenstein/">Austria vs Liechtenstein: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.