Austria vs Greenland: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Austria
- Greenland
How they compare
Austria currently reports 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Greenland, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 16th and Greenland ranks 17th of 206 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.188 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Austria |
| 2010s | 1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Austria |
| 2020s | 1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.058 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Austria or Greenland?
- Austria, at 1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Austria and Greenland?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Greenland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Greenland rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Austria ranks 16th and Greenland ranks 17th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.