Aruba vs Cayman Islands: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Aruba
- Cayman Islands
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Aruba ranks 39th and Cayman Islands ranks 39th of 206 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Cayman Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7682 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8725 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1788 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Aruba or Cayman Islands?
- Aruba, at 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Aruba and Cayman Islands?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Cayman Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Cayman Islands rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 39th and Cayman Islands ranks 39th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.