Armenia vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Armenia
0.1208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Lesotho
0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Armenia rank
98th
Lesotho rank
99th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Armenia
  • Lesotho
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102025

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0.1208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.

Armenia ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.447 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2000s -0.5855 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2010s -0.3032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2020s 0.1977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1863 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Armenia or Lesotho?
Armenia, at 0.1208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lesotho as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Armenia and Lesotho?
0.0196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Lesotho?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Armenia and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Armenia ranks 98th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/armenia/lesotho/">Armenia vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.