Argentina vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Argentina
- Grenada
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.0069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.
Argentina ranks 74th and Grenada ranks 76th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2702 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.4441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 0.4278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 0.4985 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3065 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Grenada?
- Argentina, at 0.3856 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.3787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Grenada?
- 0.0069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Grenada rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Argentina ranks 74th and Grenada ranks 76th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.