Argentina vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Argentina
0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Grenada
0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Argentina rank
75th
Grenada rank
73rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Argentina
  • Grenada
0.20.40.60.8199620102025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Grenada ahead.

Argentina ranks 75th and Grenada ranks 73rd of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Grenada Difference Ahead
1990s 0.233 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4715 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2000s 0.4557 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7878 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3321 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2010s 0.4913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7109 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2196 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Grenada
2020s 0.5264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4329 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0935 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Argentina or Grenada?
Grenada, at 0.4831 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.4476 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Argentina as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Argentina and Grenada?
0.0355 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Grenada?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Argentina and Grenada rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Argentina ranks 75th and Grenada ranks 73rd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/argentina/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/argentina/grenada/">Argentina vs Grenada: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.