American Samoa vs Slovakia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- American Samoa
- Slovakia
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Slovakia ahead.
American Samoa ranks 42nd and Slovakia ranks 43rd of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, American Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.7787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9375 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1716 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | American Samoa |
| 2020s | 0.9395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, American Samoa or Slovakia?
- American Samoa, at 0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9302 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between American Samoa and Slovakia?
- 0.0004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Slovakia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do American Samoa and Slovakia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- American Samoa ranks 42nd and Slovakia ranks 43rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.