Albania vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Albania
-0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Singapore
0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Albania rank
102nd
Singapore rank
99th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Albania
  • Singapore
-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Albania, a difference of 0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Singapore's figure about 3.1 times Albania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Singapore ahead.

Albania ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 99th of 206 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2000s -0.0257 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0902 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1159 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2010s 0.0591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore
2020s 0.0061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1147 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1086 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Albania or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Albania as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Albania and Singapore?
0.0507 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Albania and Singapore rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Albania ranks 102nd and Singapore ranks 99th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/singapore/">Albania vs Singapore: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.