Albania vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Albania
0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Lesotho
0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Albania rank
97th
Lesotho rank
99th

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Albania
  • Lesotho
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102025

How they compare

Albania currently reports 0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.2 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lesotho ahead.

Albania ranks 97th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s -0.671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2000s 0.0334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0892 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Lesotho
2010s 0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0224 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Albania
2020s 0.096 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0846 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Albania or Lesotho?
Albania, at 0.1263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lesotho as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Albania and Lesotho?
0.0251 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Lesotho?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Albania and Lesotho rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Albania ranks 97th and Lesotho ranks 99th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/albania/lesotho/">Albania vs Lesotho: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.