Albania vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Albania
- Hungary
How they compare
Albania currently reports -0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary, a difference of 0.0153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hungary ahead.
Albania ranks 102nd and Hungary ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2000s | -0.0257 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 0.0591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5181 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.459 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 0.0061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0435 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Albania or Hungary?
- Albania, at -0.0124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Hungary as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Albania and Hungary?
- 0.0153 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Albania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Hungary?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Hungary rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Albania ranks 102nd and Hungary ranks 103rd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.