Namibia vs East Timor: Vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months
Namibia
58
in 2023
East Timor
65
in 2020
Namibia rank
31st
East Timor rank
29th
Vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months over time
- Namibia
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 65 against 58 in Namibia, a difference of 7.
That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was East Timor ahead.
Namibia ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 29th of 63 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.5 | 34.75 | 29.25 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 32.38 | 58.88 | 26.5 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months, Namibia or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 65 against 58 in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months between Namibia and East Timor?
- 7, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and East Timor?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and East Timor rank globally for vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months?
- Namibia ranks 31st and East Timor ranks 29th of 63 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Vitamin a supplementation coverage rate children ages 6 59 months. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.