China vs Latvia: Urban population, primary education and below
China
0.4%
in 2013
Latvia
0.4%
in 2016
China rank
55th
Latvia rank
57th
Urban population, primary education and below over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was China ahead.
China ranks 55th and Latvia ranks 57th of 98 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.0% | China |
| 2010s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urban population, primary education and below, China or Latvia?
- China, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Latvia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in urban population, primary education and below between China and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2013.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for urban population, primary education and below?
- China ranks 55th and Latvia ranks 57th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Urban population, primary education and below (% of population with low education). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.