Togo vs Uzbekistan: Number of people living in urban slum households
Togo
1.33 million
in 2022
Uzbekistan
1.26 million
in 2022
Togo rank
65th
Uzbekistan rank
68th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Togo
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Togo currently reports 1.33 million against 1.26 million in Uzbekistan, a difference of 61,350.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Togo ranks 65th and Uzbekistan ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Togo averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Togo | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.16 million | 3.10 million | 1.94 million | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 1.26 million | 1.56 million | 300,627 | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 1.29 million | 1.02 million | 272,554 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Togo or Uzbekistan?
- Togo, at 1.33 million against 1.26 million in Uzbekistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Togo and Uzbekistan?
- 61,350, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Togo and Uzbekistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Togo and Uzbekistan rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Togo ranks 65th and Uzbekistan ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.