Lithuania vs Samoa: Number of people living in urban slum households
Lithuania
9,835
in 2022
Samoa
13,029
in 2022
Lithuania rank
128th
Samoa rank
126th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Lithuania
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 13,029 against 9,835 in Lithuania, a difference of 3,194.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 128th and Samoa ranks 126th of 174 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74,009 | 1,651 | 72,358 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 22,266 | 484 | 21,782 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 7,286 | 6,562 | 723.5 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Lithuania or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 13,029 against 9,835 in Lithuania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Lithuania and Samoa?
- 3,194, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Lithuania and Samoa rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Lithuania ranks 128th and Samoa ranks 126th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.