Kyrgyzstan vs Serbia: Number of people living in urban slum households
Kyrgyzstan
59,042
in 2022
Serbia
58,378
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
115th
Serbia rank
116th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 59,042 against 58,378 in Serbia, a difference of 664.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 116th of 174 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 685,578 | 26,006 | 659,573 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 322,776 | 19,680 | 303,096 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 58,086 | 36,581 | 21,505 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Kyrgyzstan or Serbia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 59,042 against 58,378 in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Kyrgyzstan and Serbia?
- 664, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Serbia rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 115th and Serbia ranks 116th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.