Guyana vs Lithuania: Number of people living in urban slum households
Guyana
24,569
in 2022
Lithuania
9,835
in 2022
Guyana rank
125th
Lithuania rank
128th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Guyana
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 24,569 against 9,835 in Lithuania, a difference of 14,734.
That makes Guyana's figure about 2.5 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Guyana ranks 125th and Lithuania ranks 128th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52,464 | 74,009 | 21,545 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 34,253 | 22,266 | 11,987 | Guyana |
| 2020s | 25,241 | 7,286 | 17,955 | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Guyana or Lithuania?
- Guyana, at 24,569 against 9,835 in Lithuania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Guyana and Lithuania?
- 14,734, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Lithuania?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Guyana and Lithuania rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Guyana ranks 125th and Lithuania ranks 128th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.