Georgia vs Nicaragua: Number of people living in urban slum households
Georgia
157,713
in 2022
Nicaragua
212,689
in 2020
Georgia rank
102nd
Nicaragua rank
99th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Georgia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 212,689 against 157,713 in Georgia, a difference of 54,976.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 102nd and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 174 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 269,950 | 2.04 million | 1.77 million | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 199,059 | 613,106 | 414,047 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 155,483 | 212,689 | 57,206 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Georgia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 212,689 against 157,713 in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Georgia and Nicaragua?
- 54,976, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Nicaragua?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Nicaragua rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Georgia ranks 102nd and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.