Estonia vs North Macedonia: Number of people living in urban slum households
Estonia
3,284
in 2022
North Macedonia
3,154
in 2022
Estonia rank
140th
North Macedonia rank
142nd
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Estonia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 3,284 against 3,154 in North Macedonia, a difference of 130.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 140th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 174 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 642.2 | 14,094 | 13,452 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 903.8 | 5,423 | 4,519 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 2,106 | 2,428 | 322 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Estonia or North Macedonia?
- Estonia, at 3,284 against 3,154 in North Macedonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 130, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and North Macedonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Estonia and North Macedonia rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Estonia ranks 140th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.