Djibouti vs Papua New Guinea: Number of people living in urban slum households
Djibouti
401,979
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
334,815
in 2022
Djibouti rank
88th
Papua New Guinea rank
91st
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Djibouti
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 401,979 against 334,815 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 67,164.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.2 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 174 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 425,992 | 166,170 | 259,823 | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 420,603 | 245,171 | 175,433 | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 407,632 | 325,973 | 81,659 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Djibouti or Papua New Guinea?
- Djibouti, at 401,979 against 334,815 in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Djibouti and Papua New Guinea?
- 67,164, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Papua New Guinea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Djibouti and Papua New Guinea rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Djibouti ranks 88th and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.