Cote d'Ivoire vs Nepal: Number of people living in urban slum households
Cote d'Ivoire
7.75 million
in 2022
Nepal
7.89 million
in 2022
Cote d'Ivoire rank
21st
Nepal rank
20th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 7.89 million against 7.75 million in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 138,870.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 20th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.60 million | 6.65 million | 1.05 million | Nepal |
| 2010s | 6.83 million | 8.19 million | 1.36 million | Nepal |
| 2020s | 7.86 million | 7.80 million | 61,635 | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Cote d'Ivoire or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 7.89 million against 7.75 million in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Cote d'Ivoire and Nepal?
- 138,870, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Nepal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Nepal rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 21st and Nepal ranks 20th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.