Cayman Islands vs Portugal: Number of people living in urban slum households
Cayman Islands
3,923
in 2022
Portugal
3,761
in 2022
Cayman Islands rank
138th
Portugal rank
139th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Cayman Islands
- Portugal
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 3,923 against 3,761 in Portugal, a difference of 162.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Portugal ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 138th and Portugal ranks 139th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,943 | 50,691 | 48,748 | Portugal |
| 2010s | 2,433 | 14,439 | 12,006 | Portugal |
| 2020s | 3,923 | 3,761 | 162 | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Cayman Islands or Portugal?
- Cayman Islands, at 3,923 against 3,761 in Portugal as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Cayman Islands and Portugal?
- 162, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Portugal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Cayman Islands and Portugal rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Cayman Islands ranks 138th and Portugal ranks 139th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.