Armenia vs Nicaragua: Number of people living in urban slum households
Armenia
163,418
in 2022
Nicaragua
212,689
in 2020
Armenia rank
101st
Nicaragua rank
99th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Armenia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 212,689 against 163,418 in Armenia, a difference of 49,271.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.3 times Armenia's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 174 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 241,633 | 2.04 million | 1.80 million | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 181,976 | 613,106 | 431,130 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 162,029 | 212,689 | 50,660 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Armenia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 212,689 against 163,418 in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Armenia and Nicaragua?
- 49,271, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Nicaragua?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Nicaragua rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Armenia ranks 101st and Nicaragua ranks 99th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.