Antigua and Barbuda vs Slovakia: Number of people living in urban slum households
Antigua and Barbuda
602
in 2022
Slovakia
1,907
in 2022
Antigua and Barbuda rank
149th
Slovakia rank
147th
Number of people living in urban slum households over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 1,907 against 602 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1,305.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 3.2 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 149th and Slovakia ranks 147th of 174 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 590.6 | 1,464 | 873 | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 600.5 | 1,680 | 1,080 | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher number of people living in urban slum households, Antigua and Barbuda or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 1,907 against 602 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in number of people living in urban slum households between Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia?
- 1,305, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Slovakia rank globally for number of people living in urban slum households?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 149th and Slovakia ranks 147th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Population Division, national statistical offices, and Eurostat, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Number of people living in urban slum households. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
A slum household is defined as a group of individuals living under the same roof lacking one or more of the following conditions: access to improved water and sanitation, sufficient living area, housing durability, and security of tenure.