Trinidad and Tobago vs Uruguay: Men's universal right to vote
Trinidad and Tobago
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uruguay
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 137 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Trinidad and Tobago or Uruguay?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay?
- 137 years are reported by both, from 1889 to 2025.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Uruguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.