Tajikistan vs Thailand: Men's universal right to vote
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Thailand
1
in 2025
Tajikistan rank
1st
Thailand rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Tajikistan
- Thailand
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1 against 1 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 158 shared years of data; in 1868 it was Thailand ahead.
Tajikistan ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tajikistan | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Tajikistan or Thailand?
- Tajikistan, at 1 against 1 in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Tajikistan and Thailand?
- 0, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Thailand?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Tajikistan and Thailand rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Tajikistan ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.