Sri Lanka vs Uzbekistan: Men's universal right to vote
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Uzbekistan
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 151 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Uzbekistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uzbekistan |
| 1930s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Uzbekistan |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Sri Lanka or Uzbekistan?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1865 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.