Sri Lanka vs Tajikistan: Men's universal right to vote
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 158 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Sri Lanka or Tajikistan?
- Sri Lanka, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Sri Lanka and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tajikistan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tajikistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Sri Lanka ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.