South Africa vs Uruguay: Men's universal right to vote

South Africa
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
South Africa rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • South Africa
  • Uruguay
00.20.40.60.81182519252025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Uruguay Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0.2 0.2 Uruguay
1920s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1930s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1940s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1950s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1960s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1970s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1980s 0 1 1 Uruguay
1990s 0.6 1 0.4 Uruguay
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, South Africa or Uruguay?
South Africa, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between South Africa and Uruguay?
0, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Uruguay?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do South Africa and Uruguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
South Africa ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.