Solomon Islands vs Venezuela: Men's universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Venezuela
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Venezuela rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Venezuela
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Venezuela |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Venezuela |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Venezuela |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Venezuela?
- Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Venezuela as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Venezuela?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Venezuela?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Venezuela rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.