Solomon Islands vs Tajikistan: Men's universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 133 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Tajikistan |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Tajikistan?
- Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tajikistan?
- 133 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tajikistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.