Solomon Islands vs Syria: Men's universal right to vote

Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Syria
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Syria rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Syria
00.20.40.60.81189319592025

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 1 against 1 in Syria, a difference of 0.

Across all 108 years both countries report, Syria has been ahead every year.

Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Syria ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Syria Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0.2 0.2 Syria
1930s 0 1 1 Syria
1940s 0 1 1 Syria
1950s 0 1 1 Syria
1960s 0.6 1 0.4 Syria
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Syria?
Solomon Islands, at 1 against 1 in Syria as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Syria?
0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Syria?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Solomon Islands and Syria rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Syria ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.