Slovakia vs Solomon Islands: Men's universal right to vote

Slovakia
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Slovakia rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • Slovakia
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.60.81189319592025

How they compare

Slovakia currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Slovakia ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovakia Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 1 0 1 Slovakia
1930s 1 0 1 Slovakia
1940s 1 0 1 Slovakia
1950s 1 0 1 Slovakia
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 Slovakia
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Slovakia or Solomon Islands?
Slovakia, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Slovakia and Solomon Islands?
0, with Slovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Solomon Islands?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Slovakia and Solomon Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
Slovakia ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.