Singapore vs Tajikistan: Men's universal right to vote
Singapore
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Singapore rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Singapore
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 158 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 regions.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Tajikistan |
| 1950s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | Tajikistan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Singapore or Tajikistan?
- Singapore, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
- How do Singapore and Tajikistan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Singapore ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 197 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.