Sierra Leone vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Men's universal right to vote
Sierra Leone
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Sierra Leone
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
Across all 89 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 10 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Sierra Leone or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Sierra Leone, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Sierra Leone and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 89 years are reported by both, from 1937 to 2025.
- How do Sierra Leone and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Sierra Leone ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.