San Marino vs Zambia: Men's universal right to vote

San Marino
1
in 2025
Zambia
1
in 2025
San Marino rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • San Marino
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 1 against 1 in Zambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was San Marino ahead.

San Marino ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Zambia Difference Ahead
1910s 1 0 1 San Marino
1920s 1 0 1 San Marino
1930s 1 0 1 San Marino
1940s 1 0 1 San Marino
1950s 1 0 1 San Marino
1960s 1 0.6 0.4 San Marino
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, San Marino or Zambia?
San Marino, at 1 against 1 in Zambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between San Marino and Zambia?
0, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Zambia?
115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
How do San Marino and Zambia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
San Marino ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.