San Marino vs Western Sahara: Men's universal right to vote

San Marino
1
in 2025
Western Sahara
1
in 2025
San Marino rank
1st
Western Sahara rank
1st

Men's universal right to vote over time

  • San Marino
  • Western Sahara
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 1 against 1 in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1963 it was San Marino ahead.

San Marino ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.

San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1960s 1 0 1 San Marino
1970s 1 0 1 San Marino
1980s 1 0 1 San Marino
1990s 1 0 1 San Marino
2000s 1 0.2 0.8 San Marino
2010s 1 1 0
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher men's universal right to vote, San Marino or Western Sahara?
San Marino, at 1 against 1 in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between San Marino and Western Sahara?
0, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Western Sahara?
63 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2025.
How do San Marino and Western Sahara rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
San Marino ranks 1st and Western Sahara ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Men's universal right to vote
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.