San Marino vs Suriname: Men's universal right to vote
San Marino
1
in 2025
Suriname
1
in 2025
San Marino rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- San Marino
- Suriname
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1 against 1 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 163 shared years of data; in 1863 it was Suriname ahead.
San Marino ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 197 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | San Marino |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | San Marino |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, San Marino or Suriname?
- San Marino, at 1 against 1 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between San Marino and Suriname?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Suriname?
- 163 years are reported by both, from 1863 to 2025.
- How do San Marino and Suriname rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- San Marino ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.